For many parents, cutting the umbilical cord is a memorable moment in the breathless seconds after their baby is born.
But a new scientific review suggests that delaying cord clamping by even one minute increases an infant's iron stores for up to six months.
When babies are born, they are still attached to their mothers by the umbilical cord, which delivers nutrients and oxygen throughout pregnancy. The cord is typically clamped both near the baby's navel and farther down, then snipped in between, leaving behind a small stump that falls off usually within several weeks.
In the new review, published on The Cochrane Database, researchers analyzed 15 trials from several countries, each weighing the merits of early cord clamping (within the first 60 seconds after a baby is delivered) and later clamping (more than one minute after birth). The studies included both vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
The practice of immediate cord clamping developed in part because physicians felt it reduced the risk of mothers hemorrhaging, but the new review found that delayed clamping did not increase such risks.
And waiting a minute or two to clamp the cord does have several health benefits for babies, including higher hemoglobin levels in the days immediately after birth and increased iron reserves up to six months later.
"Breast milk has very little iron in it. Nature intended for babies to get their iron from placental transfusion," explained Dr. Mark Sloan, a pediatrician and author of Birth Day: A Pediatrician Explores the Science, the History, and the Wonder of Childbirth. "From the [obstetrician's] perspective, it makes very little difference to their practice whether they clamp early or late, but for a baby from birth to 6 months of age, it does."
Previous studies have suggested that waiting to cut the cord increases babies' risk for jaundice, or yellowing of a baby's skin and eyes, and the Cochrane review did find a slight increase in the number of babies who needed to be treated for the condition. But overall, it concluded that a more liberal approach to delaying umbilical cord clamping in newborns is warranted.
An 2012 opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists was more cautious in its interpretation, saying that the ideal time for clamping the cord has not yet been established, but that several reviews have found that delaying is beneficial, particularly among pre-term babies, when possible.
Presently, immediate cord clamping is more commonly practiced, said Dr. Jeffrey Ecker, director of obstetrical clinical research and quality assurance at Massachusetts General Hospital and the chair of obstetrics practice with ACOG.
"Over time, I believe we'll see an evolution in practice with appropriate women and babies -- babies that don't otherwise need immediate attention," Ecker said. "I don't think it is all going to change in a year. But in five, 10 years, we'll look back and say, 'Boy, this is different.'"
"Basic practice habits are often formed in school and residency, and can take a while to change," echoed Sloan. He said that parents who want to delay cord clamping should feel empowered to discuss it with their doctors, midwives and nurses.
In recent months, the practice of "lotus birth," or letting the umbilical cord fall off naturally after birth, has grabbed media headlines. The cord typically separates from the baby's belly button within three to 10 days, one lotus birth website states, and "enables baby, mother and father and all family members to pause, reflect and engage in nature's conduct."
But the Cochrane review endorsed delaying cord clamping within a matter of minutes, not avoiding it altogether. To date, no scientific studies have backed the practice of waiting for umbilical cord to fall off on its own, said Sloan.
"The main benefit [to delayed clamping] is increased iron to the baby," he added. "That is done by three minutes or so."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.