This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

Nanavati Commission Says 2002 Riots 'Not Pre-Planned Conspiracy', Gives Clean Chit To Modi

The commission also questioned the credibility of three former IPS officers ― Sanjiv Bhatt, Rahul Sharma and R B Sreekumar ― who had alleged that there was role of the state government in the riots.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
PRAKASH SINGH via Getty Images
Prime Minister Narendra Modi

GANDHINAGAR — The Nanavati Commission has given a clean chit to the then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi-led government in the 2002 riots in the state where over 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed.

The commission’s report was tabled in the Gujarat Assembly by Minister of State for Home Pradeepsinh Jadeja on Wednesday, five years after it was submitted to the then government and 17 years after the riots shook the state.

The panel, comprising former Supreme Court Justice G T Nanavati and former Gujarat High Court Justice Akshay Mehta, in its report observed that police at some places were ineffective in controlling the mob because of their inadequate numbers or because they were not properly armed.

“There is no evidence to show that these attacks were either inspired or instigated or abated by any minister of the state,” the commission said in its voluminous report.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on Twitter, Facebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

The commission was appointed in 2002 by the then state chief minister Narendra Modi to probe the riots, that took place after the burning of two coaches of Sabarmati Express train near Godhra railway station, in which 59 ‘karsevaks’ were killed.

“On an overall consideration of the entire material, the commission finds that the communal riots which followed the Godhra incident were really by way of an aftermath of that incidents,” the report said.

It was because of the Godhra incident that large sections of Hindu community became very angry and ultimately indulged in violent attacks on Muslims and their properties,” it said.

The commission also said that it did not find any evidence against “any religious or political party or organisations as such” in connection with the riots.

“The only thing that can be said with some certainty, on the basis of evidence which has come before the commission, is that local members of the VHP and Bajrang Dal took part in the incidents which happened in their localities,” it said.
The panel said the post-Godhra riots that spread out in the state were “not a pre-planned conspiracy or orchestrated violence”.

There is no substance in allegations against state authorities turning a blind eye to post-Godhra riots, it said.

The commission also questioned the credibility of three former IPS officers ― Sanjiv Bhatt, Rahul Sharma and R B Sreekumar ― who had alleged that there was role of the state government in the riots.

After close scrutiny of the evidence, it is not possible to say that there was any negligence on the part of police, it noted.

However, it is very much necessary the state has a disciplined police force to ensure that peace and tranquility of the society is not disturbed, it added.

“While considering the evidence relating to the incidents which happened during the communal riots, we have noticed that the absence of police or their inadequate number emboldened the mobs to indulge in violence,” it said.

On some communal riot incidents in Ahmedabad city, the commission said, “The police had not shown their competence and eagerness which was necessary.”

The report has recommended inquiries or action, which were halted after the commission was formed, against the erring police officers.

It said the authorities should see that the media acts with restraint during such difficult times (as of riots), and that immediate effective action should be taken against the media if it is found to be transgressing the limits.

The media should ensure that it does not become instrumental in provoking more communal violence by publishing exaggerated reports about the incidents, the panel said.

The first part of the commission’s report was tabled in the state Assembly on September 25, 2009.

The panel submitted its final report (containing part two) on November 18, 2014, to then chief minister Anandiben Patel, but it was withheld since then.

The BJP-led state government in September this year told the Gujarat High Court that it will table the report in the next Assembly session.

It was responding to a PIL filed by former IPS officer R B Sreekumar, seeking a direction to the state government to make the report public.

Sreekumar, the former state DGP, who had filed affidavits before the Nanavati Commission and questioned the state government’s “inaction” during the post-Godhra riots, made a representation to then chief minister Patel in November 2015, demanding that the entire report be made public.

In February 2002, the then chief minister Narendra Modi had announced a one-member commission to inquire into the cause of the Godhra train burning incident where 59 passengers were killed and subsequent incidents of communal violence in the state.

The government later reconstituted the commission, with Justice Nanavati as its chairman and former Gujarat High Court Justice K G Shah as a member.
After Justice Shah died, Justice Mehta took his place.

The government also expanded the terms of reference of the commission, bringing under its purview the role and conduct of the chief minister, ministers and police officers during the riots.

Close
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.