NEWS
27/06/2019 4:16 PM IST

Bombay HC Upholds Maratha Quota, But Wants It Reduced To 12-13%

The court said the quota percentage should be reduced from 16 percent to 12 to 13 percent, as recommended by the State Backward Classes Commission.

Hindustan Times via Getty Images
Maharashtra bandh called by Maratha organizations to demand reservations.

MUMBAI — The Bombay High Court on Thursday upheld the constitutional validity of reservation for the Maratha community in government jobs and education.

A division bench of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre, however, said the quota percentage should be reduced from 16 percent to 12 to 13 percent, as recommended by the State Backward Classes Commission.

“We hold and declare that the state government possesses legislative competence to create a separate category of the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) and grant reservation,” the court said.

For the latest news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

“We, however, have held that the 16 percent should be reduced to 12 to 13 percent as recommended by the commission,” the bench said.

The court was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging Maharashtra government’s decision granting 16 percent reservation to the Maratha community in government jobs and educational institutions.

On November 30, 2018, the Maharashtra legislature passed a bill granting 16 per cent reservation in education and government jobs for the Marathas, declared a socially and educationally backward class by the state government.

The reservation will be in addition to the existing 52 percent overall reservation in the state. With the 16 percent reservation for Marathas, the reservation quantum in the state was expected to rise to 68 percent.

Several petitions were filed in the court challenging the reservation, while a few others were filed in its support.

The petitions challenging the quota decision had argued that it was violative of Supreme Court’s orders which say that reservation in any state should not exceed more than 50 percent.

The government, while defending its decision, had said that it was meant to alleviate the Maratha community, which it said was socially and economically backward.