By Abhishek Jha
A recent NDTV report from Hardoi district of Uttar Pradesh highlights an interesting trend. In the un-electrified areas of the district, most of the electricity needs were being earlier fulfilled by diesel generators as the power cuts were all too frequent. But this has changed since Omnigrid Micropower Company (OMC) set up a solar power plant in Jangaon village three years ago. This has reduced the cost spent by businesspersons on electricity drastically, and enabled students to use their computer lab, says the report.
With packages ranging from ₹100 a month for powering a 7 watt LED light from 5-11pm and a mobile charging socket to 24X7 supplies, the company tries to address the needs of all strata of society.
Electrified villages do not equal electricity in households
In 2015, in his Independence Day speech, the Prime Minister had pledged to electrify 18,452 un-electrified villages by 1 May 2018. The scheme that is to lead this charge is the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojna (DDUGJY), in which the earlier Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana (RGGVY) has been subsumed. A GARV portal, which tracks the progress of the scheme, claims that we have as of now (at the time of writing this article) already achieved 31% our target.
Close to 97% of the population without electricity lives in villages that already have an electric grid or in un-electrified areas of otherwise electrified villages.
However, as an opinion column pointed out last year in The Hindu, the percentage of electrified villages may not be an accurate indicator of electricity reaching the masses, the reason being the manner in which an electrified village is defined.
The definition, as it is understood by the Ministry of Power, states: "A village will be deemed to be electrified if electricity is used in the inhabited locality within the revenue boundary of the village for any purpose whatsoever." In essence, an electrified village doesn't mean that all the people living in it are able to use that electricity. That is like saying that everybody must be well fed in a town just because there's a shop that sells food, irrespective of whether it is affordable for everybody or even supplied to the shop.
According to some estimates, close to 97% of the population without electricity lives in villages that already have an electric grid or in un-electrified areas of otherwise electrified villages.
These households, then, are not under the radar of the DDUGJY. In the winter session of Parliament, for instance, the Minister of Power informed that we are terribly lagging behind in our targets in electrifying BPL (Below Poverty Line) households. So, although according to the GARV portal only 7% of villages are behind target in the DDUGJY electrification programme, as on 30 November 2011 we had achieved only 57% of our target (that may be either in an electrified or an un-electrified village).
Just providing electricity isn't enough
It is due to the lack of electricity in individual households or areas of a village -- a great chunk of which are apparently in electrified villages -- that the demand for small renewable energy providers like OMC seems to have arisen. Even then, for any massive electrification programme, the country needs to create affordable electricity and a lot of it if the government wants to achieve its targets.
For any massive electrification programme, the country needs to create affordable electricity and a lot of it if the government wants to achieve its targets.
There have been steps in this direction but one wonders whether they can also guarantee electricity that does not pollute the environment, reduce forest cover or displace people. The Coal Ministry announced in December, for instance, that the deficit in thermal coal supply was sought to be addressed by "by increasing coal production to the extent possible by facilitating Environment & Forest clearances expeditiously, pursuing with State Government for assistance in land acquisition."
Not only does that seem like a dangerous approach, it would also be in contrast to the government's own Domestic Efficient Lighting Programme (DELP), the purpose of which is to reduce carbon emissions and make better use of the electricity that is produced.
The DELP envisages replacing 77 crore incandescent bulbs with high-quality LED bulbs. Although it has reached only a few states, this programme claims to save close to 2 crore kW/h energy and reduce CO2 emissions by over 15,000 tonnes every day.
As things stand today, given our energy crisis, lighting itself demands 18% of the electricity consumed in India, according to a report. It further adds that this percentage is much higher than the global average of 13%. And that if the government plays its cards right and goes in for large-scale adoption of LEDs, this will not only bring India closer to the global average but could also prove to be more friendly to the environment as it would reduce the need to build more energy plants. A positive note here is that the cost of procuring LED bulbs in India has, according to Union Minister Piyush Goyal, seen a dramatic 76% decline, from ₹ 310 in February 2014 to ₹ 76.
Right foot forward
It is commendable that the Prime Minister is working on an ambitious plan. But round-the-clock electricity for every household still seems a distant dream. There is little doubt, however, that the Prime Minister indeed wishes so, for he has never shied away -- in his speeches, at least -- from creating better infrastructure. However, he must also ensure that the infrastructure reaches everybody, is cost-effective and does not harm the country's environment.
Also see on HuffPost: