Yuji Sakai via Getty Images
I am not even remotely condoning the incidents but if we start viewing every dreadful occurrence in the country from the same viewpoint then every remote act -- good or bad -- can be interpreted as part of a grand design. The question that we need to address is whether the alleged grand design exists or is sought to be constructed? In my opinion, no such grand design exists.
Does the government really believe that the ban would be workable, leave alone effective? Would it really bring down crimes against women and children? If the government has conducted any credible study in this regard, it should share the same with the citizenry in order to legitimise the ban. Right now the ban only serves to increase state's hegemony, not citizens' safety. The purpose of the state at best can be to protect the life and liberty of citizens. History bears witness that bans serve neither.
ROB ELLIOTT via Getty Images
It is obvious to an ordinary citizen like me that politics is means to an end not end in itself; perhaps our parliamentarians would do well to be reminded of this simple home truth. They carry with themselves the responsibility, hopes and aspirations of billion plus humans. Surely no single issue-perhaps with the exception of national security can be important enough to suspend parliamentary discourse.
There is a beautiful similarity between a marriage and a government - the first anniversary is too nascent a landmark to write eulogies or obituaries for either. The moment can be used for reflection, introspection even interrogation but certainly not for passing verdicts.