This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

Arvind Kejriwal Put On Trial In Arun Jaitley Defamation Case By Delhi Court

The trial in the case will commence on 20 May.
Stringer India / Reuters

NEW DELHI -- Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders were today put on trial by a court here in a criminal defamation case filed by Union minister Arun Jaitley in the DDCA controversy, amid chaotic scenes in the court room.

During the proceedings, some advocates got into a heated argument over non-appearance of Jaitley and on the issue whether the matter should be adjourned.

After one of the lawyers issued threats to another counsel inside the court room, the accused persons -- Kejriwal, Ashutosh, Kumar Vishwas, Sanjay Singh and Raghav Chaddha -- who were present in the court, said they were facing a serious threat and cited the JNU sedition case violence a year back when men in the black robes had beaten up varsity students and journalists.

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Sumit Dass, thereafter, called security personnel and ordered that the court room be cleared barring those who were connected with the case.

Thereafter, notice was framed against the accused under section 500 (punishment for defamation) of the IPC to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

Notice was also framed against another AAP leader Deepak Vajpai who was represented by his counsel.

Later, the court posted the matter for further hearing to 20 May.

Before the court's order, some of the defence counsel sought discharge of the accused citing absence of Jaitley at "such an important stage" and said that notice should not be framed in absence of the complainant.

Kejriwal's counsel said, "Let not a message go out of this court that this is luxury litigation by the complainant and, therefore, it is going like a fast-track proceeding."

"It's a political case. There are many people languishing in jail due to the pendency of cases and trials. Let this trial also proceed in the due course and not on a fast-track basis," the CM's advocate Rahul Mehra said.

Jaitley had filed the complaint alleging that the accused had defamed him in a controversy regarding Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) which he headed for over a decade.

A civil defamation suit has also been filed by Jaitley before the Delhi High Court in the matter seeking Rs 10 crore as damages.

During arguments, Jaitley's counsel and senior advocate Siddharth Luthra said that his client had been appearing in the case and that there was no need for the complainant's presence while framing of charges in the case.

Outside the court premises, Chaddha said he would file an FIR in connection with today's incident while Ashutosh said that "if the proceedings in a case filed by the Union finance minister and the defence minister witnesses such a ruckus, it as a matter of serious concern".

On 30 January, the court had dismissed Kejriwal's plea seeking to be heard on the point of framing of notice.

Also on HuffPost India

Dhirubhai Ambani

9 Self Made Indians Whose Success Will Inspire You

Close
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.