This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

Kanhaiya Kumar Says There is A Difference Between 2002 Gujarat Riots And 1984 Sikh Riots

2002 Gujarat Riots And 1984 Sikh Riots Were Different, Says Kanhaiya Kumar
NEW DELHI, INDIA - MARCH 20: JNU Studentsâ Union President Kanhaiya Kumar speaks during a Public Symposium, on March 20, 2016 in New Delhi, India. The arrest of Kanhaiya Kumar had generated a huge controversy, with the opposition parties accusing the government of suppressing freedom of speech. (Photo by Virendra Singh Gosain/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Hindustan Times via Getty Images
NEW DELHI, INDIA - MARCH 20: JNU Studentsâ Union President Kanhaiya Kumar speaks during a Public Symposium, on March 20, 2016 in New Delhi, India. The arrest of Kanhaiya Kumar had generated a huge controversy, with the opposition parties accusing the government of suppressing freedom of speech. (Photo by Virendra Singh Gosain/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

NEW DELHI -- JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar yesterday compared the alleged onslaught on varsities with Gujarat riots alleging both of them were carried out "with support" from state machinery even as he stressed that there is a fundamental difference between "emergency" and "fascism".

Asserting that there is a difference between 2002 riots and 1984 Sikh massacre, Kanhaiya alleged that Gujarat violence was carried out through state machinery while the other was caused due to mob frenzy.

"There is difference between emergency and fascism. During emergency, goons of only one party were engaged into goondaism, in this (fascism) entire state machinery is resorting to goondaism. There is difference between riots of 2002 and 1984 Sikh riots.

"There is a fundamental difference between a mob killing a common man and massacring people through state machinery. Therefore, the threat of communal fascism we are faced with today, there is an attack being launched on universities, because like Hitler, Modi ji doesn't have support from intellectuals in India. No intellectual is defending Modi regime," he added.

Noting the present time is an era of "Islamophobia" , Kanhaiya underscored a need for understanding history first before reaching a conclusion on any issue.

"Today it's an era of Islamophobia. Leave aside the words of terrorism and terrorist. The moment these words will come to your mind, imprints of face of a Muslim person will be there in your mind. This is Islamophobia.

"Connotations, meaning of a word change. Hence, it is important for us to understand history before we reach to conclusion on anything," he said.

Kanhaiya was addressing the gathering during a panel discussion on "Voices of Azaadi" during the "Jashn-e-azaadi" festival which was organised to celebrate the birth anniversary of the late historian Professor Bipan Chandra.

The celebration comes at a time when JNU students have kick started a "nationalism and azaadi debate" across the country after it came under attack for an event on campus against the hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru during which anti-national slogans were allegedly raised.

Contact HuffPost India

Also see on HuffPost:

India In The 18th Century

Close
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.