National Herald Case: SC Exempts Sonia, Rahul Gandhi From Personal Appearance

12/02/2016 2:32 PM IST | Updated 15/07/2016 8:26 AM IST
Hindustan Times via Getty Images
NEW DELHI, INDIA - JANUARY 29: Congress President Sonia Gandhi arrives for Beating Retreat ceremony, on January 29, 2016 in New Delhi, India. This year, 15 Military Bands, 18 Pipes and Drums Bands from Regimental Centres and Battalions are participated in the ceremony. (Photo by Ajay Aggarwal/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

NEW DELHI -- The Supreme Court today refused to interfere with the order of the Delhi High Court rejecting the plea of Congress President Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings in the National Herald case before the trial court but gave them some relief by expunging certain observations of the High Court.

The apex court also allowed their plea for exemption from personal appearance in the case before the trial court which is scheduled to take up the matter on 20 February. However, it came with a rider with the court saying that it would be open for the Magistrate at any stage to seek their personal appearance as and when required.

Though BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, who is the complainant in the case, contested the plea for exemption from appearance, a bench comprising justices J S Khehar and C Nagappan said that "in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case and the position occupied by the petitioners, we are of the view that the presence of the petitioners before the trial court would cause more inconvenience than convenience."

"Petitioners shall be exempted from personal appearance and it is needless to say that it will be open for the trial court to seek their presence at any stage if and when their presence is required," the court said.

The bench, which passed the order after hearing senior advocates Kapil Sibal, A M Singhvi and R S Cheema, who were appearing for Gandhis and others, and Swamy, said, "So far determination granted by the Delhi high court in rejecting the prayer for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner, we do not find justification for interfering with it."

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact HuffPost India

Also see on HuffPost:

Indian Wedding Shot Using Only An iPhone

More On This Topic