This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.

Salman Hit-And-Run Case: Bombay HC Says Ravindra Patil A 'Wholly Unreliable' Witness

Bombay HC Says Ravindra Patil A 'Wholly Unreliable' Witness In Salman Hit-And-Run Case
MUMBAI, INDIA - MAY 8: Bollywood actor Salman Khan arrives at sessions court for the bail bond for the hit and run case on May 8, 2015 in Mumbai, India. Bollywood superstar furnished a bail bond of Rs 30,000 in the Mumbai Sessions Court, before returning to his Bandra home. (Photo by Arijit Sen/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
Hindustan Times via Getty Images
MUMBAI, INDIA - MAY 8: Bollywood actor Salman Khan arrives at sessions court for the bail bond for the hit and run case on May 8, 2015 in Mumbai, India. Bollywood superstar furnished a bail bond of Rs 30,000 in the Mumbai Sessions Court, before returning to his Bandra home. (Photo by Arijit Sen/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

MUMBAI -- The Bombay High Court today doubted the evidence of Ravindra Patil, former police bodyguard of Bollywood star Salman Khan and witness in the 2002 hit-and-run case, observing that he was "wholly unreliable."

Justice A R Joshi said this while dictating the verdict in the appeal filed by the actor against the five-year sentence awarded to him by a Mumbai sessions court on May 6 this year.

Patil had lodged the FIR in this case on September 28, 2002, hours after the mishap occurred. In the FIR, he did not mention whether Salman was driving the car under the influence of liquor.

However, on October 1, 2002, after the receipt of Salman's blood test report, Patil gave a statement before a Magistrate saying that the actor had taken drinks on the ill-fated day and he had warned him not to drive rashly or else he would meet with an accident but Salman did not pay heed to his advice.

The Judge observed today that the evidence of Patil was doubtful because he had made improvements in his version later when his statement was recorded.

"In view of this, he (Patil) is "wholly unreliable witness", the Judge noted while dictating his order in the court for the third consecutive day.

"Even if his statement has to be considered as partially reliable, there has to be corroboration in evidence which is not existing in this case," said the Judge in the court jam-packed with lawyers, reporters and law students.

Ravindra Patil passed away in 2007 and was not available during the trial in the sessions court. However, the prosecution had produced Patil's statement recorded by a Magistrate earlier in which he had implicated Salman.

The trial court accepted Patil's statement and said it was admissible in law, based on which the actor was convicted.

Salman, however, challenged the admissibility of the statement and said the witness was not available to him for cross-examination and contended that the trial court had erred in accepting this piece of evidence.

The High Court, however,is yet to give a ruling on the admissibility of Patil's statement.

On September 28, 2002, the actor's car had rammed into a shop in suburban Bandra. In the mishap, one person was killed and four others injured.

Salman, who is on bail, did not come to the court, though his sister, Alvira Khan-Agnihotri, attended the hearing.

Contact HuffPost India

Also see on HuffPost:

Black Buck Case, 1998

salman khan

Close
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost India, which closed in 2020. Some features are no longer enabled. If you have questions or concerns about this article, please contact indiasupport@huffpost.com.